2019 JAMB CRS PAST QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

God’s message, “I send you to the people of Israel, to a nation of rebels,” was directed to Prophet Jeremiah. This commissioning highlights Jeremiah’s role in addressing the rebelliousness of Israel and calling them back to faithfulness. The other prophets listed had different missions and contexts, making Jeremiah the correct recipient of this specific message of rebuke and correction.

Daniel was set up to be thrown to the lions by the presidents and satraps of Persia. This conspiracy was motivated by jealousy and fear of Daniel’s high position and his unwavering faith in God. The other groups listed, such as Nebuchadnezzar’s counselors or advisers of King Xerxes, do not accurately represent the officials responsible for Daniel’s persecution in the biblical account.

David restrained Abishai from killing Saul because he wanted to see if Saul would repent and turn back to God. This shows David’s respect for Saul’s position as the Lord’s anointed and his trust in God’s judgment. Allowing Saul to live provided an opportunity for reconciliation and demonstrated David’s commitment to divine authority over personal vengeance. The other options focus on different motivations, but repentance aligns best with the biblical narrative.

Total obedience to God’s commandments is often associated with receiving life and length of days. In many religious texts, adherence to divine laws leads to blessings and longevity. While wisdom, knowledge, and marital possessions are valuable, they are not the primary rewards emphasized for complete obedience. This underscores the importance of life and sustained well-being as divine rewards.

Eve was named because she was “the mother of all living,” highlighting her role in the genesis of humanity. This naming signifies her importance in the biblical narrative as the progenitor of the human race. The other options relate to deception or bones, which are not the primary reasons for her name. Emphasizing her maternal role aligns with the theological significance of her character.

When Moses cast his rod on the ground and it became a serpent, his immediate reaction was to take hold of it by the tail. This act demonstrated his authority and control over the miraculous transformation, reinforcing his role as God’s chosen leader. The other options (shouting for joy, fleeing, or catching it immediately) do not align with the biblical account, where Moses confidently interacts with the transformed rod.

King Solomon’s disobedience led to God promising to divide the kingdom after his reign. This divine judgment was due to Solomon’s deviation from God’s commandments, which included idolatry influenced by his foreign wives. The other options, such as disloyalty of subjects or loss of favor, are related but the specific consequence was the division of the kingdom, affecting the nation’s political structure.

Prophet Isaiah likens God’s creative ability to that of a potter shaping an earthen vessel. This metaphor emphasizes God’s sovereignty and craftsmanship in creating and forming nations and individuals. The other options (ruler and followers, master and servant, shepherd and sheep) represent different aspects of leadership and guidance but do not capture the creative and formative power illustrated in the potter analogy.

David escaped to the wilderness of Engedi. This location provided him a place of refuge from Saul’s pursuit, allowing him to gather supporters and strategize. The wilderness offered a strategic advantage and safety compared to other locations like Mizpeh of Moab or the cave of Abdullam. Engedi’s geographical features made it an ideal hiding spot, highlighting David’s tactical decisions during his flight.

Hiram was friendly with King Solomon because he wanted to assist in building the Temple. Their alliance was based on mutual benefits, including trade and construction expertise. Hiram’s support was crucial for the successful completion of Solomon’s grand architectural projects. The other options, such as fear of war or personal relationships, are less relevant to the historical cooperation depicted in biblical accounts.

Abraham was in Haran when God commanded him to leave his country, kindred, and father’s house to go to a land God would show him. This migration marked the beginning of the covenant between God and Abraham, leading to the establishment of the Israelites. The other locations like Shechem, Bethel, or Ur are significant in Abraham’s journey but Haran is where he was specifically when the call to move originated.

God repented His intention to destroy His people because Moses reminded Him of His promises to Abraham, Isaac, and Israel. Moses interceded on behalf of the Israelites, appealing to God’s faithfulness and covenantal promises. This plea highlighted God’s mercy and willingness to relent from planned punishment. The other options related to Moses’ actions do not specifically address the reason for God’s change of heart in this context.

Gideon built an altar named “The LORD is Peace” at the oak of Ophrah to signify his dedication to God after defeating the Midianites. This act was a declaration of trust in God’s provision and a commitment to worship. The name reflects the desired state of harmony and divine favor. The other options do not accurately represent the specific name given by Gideon, which emphasized peace as a central theme.

The second creation story, found in Genesis 2, concludes with the institution of marriage. This narrative focuses on the creation of Eve and the establishment of the marital relationship between man and woman. The other options, such as the sabbath, Passover, or circumcision, are significant but pertain to different parts of biblical teachings and events. Marriage is the key institution highlighted at the end of the second creation account.

King David’s greatest domestic problem was the revolt of his son Absalom. Absalom’s rebellion threatened David’s rule and stability of his kingdom, leading to internal conflict and strife. While his adultery with Bathsheba and the killing of Uriah were significant sins, the direct challenge to his kingship came from Absalom’s actions. This civil unrest nearly resulted in David losing his kingdom.

God declaring to make a nation from the son of the slave woman refers to Ishmael, recognizing him as Abraham’s descendant despite the complexities of his lineage. This demonstrates God’s inclusive plans and His ability to fulfill promises through unexpected means. The other options focus on partiality or responsibility, but the key point is the establishment of a nation through Ishmael, highlighting God’s sovereignty in choosing His path.

The chief buffer refers to Joseph recalling his faults before Pharaoh, specifically his inability to interpret Pharaoh’s dreams initially. This admission showcases Joseph’s humility and his recognition of his own limitations, which led to his reliance on God for wisdom. The other options relate to different aspects of his experience in Egypt but do not directly address the faults related to interpreting dreams.

This statement refers to the Parable of the Sower, where Jesus describes the natural growth process of seeds as an analogy for how the word of God grows in different types of hearts. The progression from the blade to the ear symbolizes the stages of growth and maturity in faith. The other parables, such as the mustard seed or weeds, focus on different aspects of spiritual growth and challenges, making the Sower parable the correct reference.

Peter became frightened while walking on the sea due to the strong wind and stormy conditions. Although he initially walked towards Jesus, the fear caused him to begin sinking when he noticed the wind. This event highlights the human tendency to falter in faith under pressure. The other options, like seeing a ghost or doubling Jesus, are not part of the biblical narrative related to this event.

Upon receiving his sight, the blind man followed Jesus, glorifying God. This act of devotion demonstrates his gratitude and recognition of Jesus’ miracle. Unlike merely thanking or jumping for joy, his commitment to follow Jesus signifies a deeper transformation and acknowledgment of divine intervention. This behavior aligns with the biblical portrayal of healed individuals responding with faith and dedication.

According to Luke’s Gospel, the sequence during the crucifixion was the casting of lots for Jesus’ garments, followed by mockery and scoffing, and then the crucifixion itself. This order reflects the progression of the soldiers’ actions from dividing Jesus’ clothes to verbally insulting Him before the actual crucifixion took place. Understanding this sequence helps in comprehending the narrative structure and the escalating treatment of Jesus during his final moments.

The angel informed Zachariah that John the Baptist would drink no wine or strong drink because he would be filled with the Holy Spirit from birth. This divine empowerment was to prepare John for his role as the forerunner of Jesus, emphasizing his spiritual purity and dedication. The other options, while related to John’s mission, do not specifically address the reason for his abstention from alcohol as the Holy Spirit’s influence.

During the Last Supper, Jesus used bread and wine as emblems to represent His body and blood. These symbols were instituted to commemorate His sacrifice and to establish the practice of Communion among His followers. The bread and wine serve as lasting reminders of the covenant and the salvation offered through Jesus’ death and resurrection. Other options mix different elements, but the bread and wine are the specific symbols used in this event.

Peter stated that the replacement for Judas Iscariot must be a witness to Jesus’ ministry, encompassing his teachings, miracles, and resurrection. This requirement ensured that the new apostle would have firsthand experience and credibility in affirming Jesus’ divinity and mission. The other conditions, while important, do not specifically address the need for comprehensive witness as emphasized by Peter.

Jesus’ immediate response to “They have no wine” was, “Woman, what have you to do with me? My hour has not yet come.” This reply emphasizes the divine timing of His miracles and His awareness of His mission’s purpose. It subtly redirects the conversation while still performing the miracle, highlighting Jesus’ control over the circumstances and His focus on fulfilling His divine role. The other responses do not align with the scriptural account of this interaction.

Demetrius and Aristarchus were the Macedonians who accompanied Paul to Ephesus. Their support was instrumental in Paul’s missionary journeys, providing companionship and assistance in spreading the Gospel. The other pairs listed do not match the biblical accounts of those who traveled with Paul to Ephesus, making Demetrius and Aristarchus the correct identifiers.

Jesus addressed this statement to the Jews because of their unbelief. Despite witnessing His miracles and teachings, many in the Jewish generation failed to accept Him as the Messiah, prompting Jesus’ expression of frustration and weariness. This reflects the recurring theme of rejection faced by Jesus from His own people, emphasizing the challenges of faith and acceptance within the community.

According to the first Epistle of John, to have the Son (Jesus Christ) is to have life. This emphasizes the spiritual and eternal life that comes through a relationship with Jesus. The other options, while related to Christian theology, do not directly reflect the specific teaching in the first Epistle of John regarding the significance of having the Son.

In the parable of the weeds, Jesus explains that the righteous will shine like the sun in their Father’s kingdom. This imagery signifies the ultimate vindication and glory of the righteous in the divine realm. The other options, while positive, do not capture the specific portrayal of the righteous shining brightly as described in the parable, which emphasizes their distinct and exalted status in God’s kingdom.

The Council at Jerusalem decided that Gentiles should abstain from idolatry, unchastity, strangled meat, and blood. This decision aimed to maintain unity between Jewish and Gentile believers by setting basic moral and dietary guidelines. These abstentions were meant to prevent cultural and religious conflicts, ensuring that Gentile converts respected essential aspects of Jewish law. The other options include activities or practices not specifically addressed by the council’s resolution.

God’s response to the statement was that the soul was required of him. This reflects the biblical principle that one cannot serve both God and worldly pleasures, emphasizing spiritual priorities over material indulgence. The other options suggest self-satisfaction or accumulation of treasures, which do not align with the scriptural teaching that spiritual obligations take precedence over earthly desires.

The first person to recognize Peter after his denial was a servant girl. According to the Gospel accounts, the servant girl noticed Peter’s presence and identified him as one of Jesus’ followers, even after his denial. This moment underscores Peter’s vulnerability and the fulfillment of Jesus’ prediction. The other options, such as other disciples or leaders, do not match the specific narrative details.

The woman with the flow of blood touched Jesus’ garment because she believed that merely touching His clothes would heal her. Her faith in Jesus’ power to heal was the driving force behind her action, demonstrating her trust and desperation for healing. The other options, such as hearing reports or crowd dynamics, do not directly address her personal motivation rooted in faith for the healing.

Paul instructed believers to prepare for the Second Coming of Christ by keeping awake and being sober. This preparation involves spiritual vigilance and moral integrity, ensuring readiness for Christ’s return. The other options, while involving positive actions, do not specifically capture the emphasis on alertness and sobriety as key aspects of preparation outlined in the letter to the Thessalonians.

Paul taught that the Romans were reconciled to God through the death of Jesus Christ. This reconciliation signifies the removal of enmity through Jesus’ sacrificial death, bridging the gap between humanity and divinity. The other options, such as suffering, ascension, or resurrection, play roles in Christian theology but the primary act of reconciliation was through Christ’s death.

Paul emphasized that acknowledging Jesus as Lord must be through faith. This declaration underscores the necessity of personal belief and acceptance of Jesus’ divine authority. The other options, like revelation knowledge, grace, or the Holy Spirit, are important in Christian faith but the specific requirement Paul mentions is the act of faith in recognizing Jesus as Lord.

Peter explains that the genuineness of Christian faith is tested by trials. These challenges serve to refine and strengthen believers’ faith, proving its authenticity and resilience. Fire, suffering, and temptation are related to trials but Peter specifically highlights trials as the means of testing faith, ensuring that true believers remain steadfast despite hardships.

Paul instructed believers in Colossians not to lie to one another because they had put off the old nature with its practices. This transformation through Christ means that believers are now called to live truthfully, reflecting their new identity. The other options, while significant, do not directly address the reason for honesty as linked to shedding the old self and embracing a new, truthful life in Christ.

Paul teaches that believers who maintain good conduct before governing authorities shall receive approval. This good behavior reflects their commitment to ethical living and respect for societal laws, fostering positive relationships and credibility within the community. Enjoying peace or being highly honored are beneficial but the specific teaching focuses on receiving approval through good conduct.

According to Peter, when the chief Shepherd (Jesus) is revealed, the elders will receive the unfading crown of glory. This crown symbolizes eternal reward and recognition for their faithful service and leadership in the church. The other options, such as scepters or houses of glory, do not specifically align with the metaphor of a crown of glory as described by Peter, which emphasizes honor and eternal reward.

Paul boasted about the believers in Corinth for their maturity in Christ. This maturity reflects their spiritual growth, understanding, and ability to live out their faith effectively. While zeal, offerings, and spiritual gifts are commendable, the specific aspect Paul highlights is their maturity, indicating a deep and well-established faith.

God exalted the name of Jesus above every other name because He humbled Himself to be born in human form and was obedient to death. This act of humility and sacrifice demonstrated Jesus’ supreme authority and divine purpose, warranting His exaltation. The other options focus on equality with God or humility in a different context, but the specific reason for exaltation is Jesus’ humble obedience unto death, fulfilling His mission.

Joshua reacted to the defeat by renting his clothes, a traditional sign of mourning and distress. This response demonstrated his deep sorrow and the seriousness of the defeat, reflecting the gravity of the situation for the Israelites. Fasting or praying could also be reactions, but the specific biblical account mentions Joshua renting his clothes as an immediate display of grief and repentance.

Hosea declares that while the upright walk in the ways of the LORD, transgressors stumble in them. This highlights the contrast between those who follow God’s commands faithfully and those who fail to uphold them, resulting in moral and spiritual failures. The other options describe different reactions but do not capture the specific outcome of transgressors stumbling as mentioned by Hosea.

After destroying Jerusalem, Nebuchadnezzar took the noblemen into exile but left behind the poorest people. This strategy aimed to weaken the leadership and elite class, making it easier to control the remaining population. The priests and temple guards were typically part of the elite who were exiled, not left behind. The poorest were often left to maintain the economy and social structure under Babylonian rule.

According to Amos, God declared a famine of not hearing the word of the LORD. This spiritual famine emphasizes the lack of divine guidance and understanding among the people, leading to moral and societal decay. Unlike physical famines like lack of bread or water, this type of famine affects the people’s relationship with God and their spiritual well-being.

Prophet Ezekiel’s statement “The soul that sins shall die” means that every person is responsible for their own sin. This emphasizes personal accountability and the consequences of one’s actions, highlighting the direct relationship between sin and personal spiritual death. The other interpretations focus on broader judgments or the nature of sin’s consequences, but the specific meaning relates to individual responsibility.

The consequence of Hiel building Jericho was that he lost two of his sons. This fulfillment of a biblical prophecy underscores the serious repercussions of failing to honor divine commands. Hiel’s attempt to rebuild Jericho without God’s blessing led to personal loss, demonstrating the importance of obedience and reliance on God’s will. The other options do not align with the specific outcome detailed in the narrative.

God’s message, “I send you to the people of Israel, to a nation of rebels,” was directed to Prophet Jeremiah. This commissioning highlights Jeremiah’s role in addressing the rebelliousness of Israel and calling them back to faithfulness. The other prophets listed had different missions and contexts, making Jeremiah the correct recipient of this specific message of rebuke and correction.

Daniel was set up to be thrown to the lions by the presidents and satraps of Persia. This conspiracy was motivated by jealousy and fear of Daniel’s high position and his unwavering faith in God. The other groups listed, such as Nebuchadnezzar’s counselors or advisers of King Xerxes, do not accurately represent the officials responsible for Daniel’s persecution in the biblical account.